Board Index | Search | Profile |
Page 6 of 12 |
[ 180 posts ] | Go to page Previous 1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 12 Next |
Print view | Previous topic | Next topic |
Author | Message |
---|---|
Main: Obesity
Level: 2249 Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 4:33 am Posts: 2127 |
The Voomy One wrote: Personally I have found that a vis of 50-100 is low enough. You can be seen if you move with people too close but as soon as you stop thrusting the vis will drop fast. You cant expect a engine with very high thrust/turning and also very low vis. Once you get below 100 vis it will start effecting other stats. tbh, i dont see 50, nor 100 vis as low enough vis on an engine. why? well, my seer, which has a standard setup of 3 seer mast athena+, can ping up other seers that is moving with qua vazuk - 14 vis from 800 away... so i guess if you up that engine vis to ~50, i can see them from few 1000 out, and even SDs with athena+s and a decent ping radar can see them when moving from a few hundred distance away. I think _________________ JeffL wrote: I stopped being able to totally understand that function years ago. Too long since I wrote it, and now it's all confusing. =) The Voomy One wrote: You gotta be shitting me >_< |
Thu Sep 16, 2010 12:44 pm |
|
Team:
Rank: Operator Main: Hooch Dealer Level: 4389 Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:20 pm Posts: 1353 Location: Who is John Galt? |
The Voomy One wrote: Excuse me but how exactly is it a nerf? And keep in mind that vis is messed up on a lot of engines and will get fixed, other then that the actual stats will be beefed.... I think that sum's it up nicely. _________________ 3 Basic types of players(quitters, losers, and winners) Choose your own fate. http://www.gbtv.com http://www.theblaze.com |
Thu Sep 16, 2010 12:57 pm |
|
Main: Demiser of D
Level: 4 Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 6:46 pm Posts: 5424 Location: Listening to Fire On High, best song ever. |
The Voomy One wrote: Excuse me but how exactly is it a nerf? And keep in mind that vis is messed up on a lot of engines and will get fixed, other then that the actual stats will be beefed.... I'm glad that many are getting fixed... But the reason it's a nerf is because with 300 vis, it at least takes a while to rev up the point where they can see you. with 900 vis, any thrusting at all lights me up like a Christmas tree. _________________ JeffL wrote: That's it. I quit! Battlecruiser23 wrote: Fuck you, Cygnus. |
Thu Sep 16, 2010 2:09 pm |
|
Team:
Rank: Councilor Main: The Voomy One Level: 1337 Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 12:06 am Posts: 4137 |
You are speaking of the Unholy Lion Thruster Im guessing, a engine that was never meant to be a stealth engine and that has probably gotten it's stats beefed. Nerf? I dont think so.
Quote: tbh, i dont see 50, nor 100 vis as low enough vis on an engine. why? well, my seer, which has a standard setup of 3 seer mast athena+, can ping up other seers that is moving with qua vazuk - 14 vis from 800 away... so i guess if you up that engine vis to ~50, i can see them from few 1000 out, and even SDs with athena+s and a decent ping radar can see them when moving from a few hundred distance away. Im talking about engines for Sniper which you might notice if you read through my posts. Imo Seer requires engines with lower vis because they need to get closer to their target. They also get agility bonuses which helps a lot. |
Thu Sep 16, 2010 2:24 pm |
|
over 9000!
Team:
Rank: Councilor Main: Churchill Level: 5620 Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm Posts: 11706 |
Dodging a dg full of AI that will each one shot my ship with energy volly+'s from their one torp(of 2/4) requires me to have a butt load of agility.
A sniper should just need to warp out and then start up causing hell. _________________ Salt Assault drew this conclusion from the latest devblog. [img]http://oi62.tinypic.com/33208ex.jpg[/img] |
Thu Sep 16, 2010 2:43 pm |
|
Team:
Rank: Main: thebattler36 Level: 2015 Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 3:24 am Posts: 2211 Location: Glasgow, Scotland |
Battlecruiser23 wrote: Dodging a dg full of AI that will each one shot my ship with energy volly+'s from their one torp(of 2/4) requires me to have a butt load of agility. A sniper should just need to warp out and then start up causing hell. then change your shield. m00 or get moar energy resists. _________________ Octo wrote: QFT Octo either owned the fish initially, or scooped it when he podded any/all of the above. |
Thu Sep 16, 2010 2:59 pm |
|
over 9000!
Team:
Rank: Councilor Main: Churchill Level: 5620 Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm Posts: 11706 |
How does a Seer in a Death Striker even have energy resists when dealing with an Omega Battlestation and its 8 Omega Platform guards?
_________________ Salt Assault drew this conclusion from the latest devblog. [img]http://oi62.tinypic.com/33208ex.jpg[/img] |
Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:21 pm |
|
Main: Demiser of D
Level: 4 Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 6:46 pm Posts: 5424 Location: Listening to Fire On High, best song ever. |
ULT got nerfed. Btw.
so now its worse and also has 909 visibility. _________________ JeffL wrote: That's it. I quit! Battlecruiser23 wrote: Fuck you, Cygnus. |
Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:24 pm |
|
Member
Team:
Rank: Main: Bonehead Level: 2447 Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 5:18 pm Posts: 737 |
Actually the idea of a single engine for thrust, turning and stopping is the real problem.
There should be three separate engines: 1) Main Engines used only for forward thrust. 2) Steering Engine(s) used to turn the ship. Large ships could have multiple turning slots to improve performance at the cost of space and weight. 3) Parking Engine(s) used to stop all motion. Again multiple engines could be used on large ships. Parking Engines would be optional and player preference. By separating the engines into these categories players can select the right engine combinations for their ships based on personal preferences. |
Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:59 pm |
|
Team:
Rank: Main: Mouse Level: 4442 Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 12:03 pm Posts: 250 Location: Narfuk in England |
I tried RC on test as a DM Rhino and it worked fine definitely didn't bother me. As for what Voomy said about snipers having to choose, personally I think this is fine. As a fully blown sniper I always choose between two different engines either a Qua Vazuk for stealth or my Venu Motor* shielded for agility.
_________________ I Bark Very Little But I Know How To Bite............... Meow |
Thu Sep 16, 2010 4:02 pm |
|
Team:
Rank: Officer Main: StarDrifter SunSoar Level: 3093 Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:23 pm Posts: 458 Location: Near your cookies |
Bonecrusher wrote: Actually the idea of a single engine for thrust, turning and stopping is the real problem. There should be three separate engines: 1) Main Engines used only for forward thrust. 2) Steering Engine(s) used to turn the ship. Large ships could have multiple turning slots to improve performance at the cost of space and weight. 3) Parking Engine(s) used to stop all motion. Again multiple engines could be used on large ships. Parking Engines would be optional and player preference. /signed THIS would be a true engine rebalance (a big one at that...). I can imagine that this would be a huge undertaking. By separating the engines into these categories players can select the right engine combinations for their ships based on personal preferences. _________________ http://angelicneo.mybrute.com =Neo= |
Thu Sep 16, 2010 4:24 pm |
|
Member
Team:
Rank: Main: KorGgenT Level: 2525 Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 1:16 am Posts: 539 Location: DG 0.839 |
The Voomy One wrote: Quote: Heres a question: why balance the other engines to the level of rc at all? LET freighter locked engines be stupidly powerful. They need to be. No they dont need to be stupidly powerful. We need a working balance sheet so prevent OP items being added in the future and Freighters are.....well freighters....They should be heavy and turn a bit slow. Balance is very important in a online game, if items are too good there is no room to add new items. Keep in mind that we have tech 21 engines coming very soon. So you are saying there should be no such thing as a combat freighter and all engineers and shield monkeys should quit? because you seem to be really adamant about freighters being almost useless in battle due to bad maneuverability. _________________ "Why be difficult, when with a little more effort you can be impossible?" "Just because we are mortal enemies, doesn't mean we can't be friends." - Retyu JeffL wrote: It's all a scam! omg!!!! |
Thu Sep 16, 2010 6:29 pm |
|
Site Admin / Dev Team
Team:
Rank: Director Main: Jeff_L Level: 1969 Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 2:21 am Posts: 3894 Location: Santa Clara, CA |
Bonecrusher wrote: Actually the idea of a single engine for thrust, turning and stopping is the real problem. There should be three separate engines: 1) Main Engines used only for forward thrust. 2) Steering Engine(s) used to turn the ship. Large ships could have multiple turning slots to improve performance at the cost of space and weight. 3) Parking Engine(s) used to stop all motion. Again multiple engines could be used on large ships. Parking Engines would be optional and player preference. By separating the engines into these categories players can select the right engine combinations for their ships based on personal preferences. If I was designing it from the ground up, yes, I would do it that way, and I would require energy to thrust and turn. But I think at this point, that would be too much of a change, and I'm not also 100% convinced that it's the right move anyway. It would be simpler in one sense, but also more complicated in that the amount of equipment needed for a ship would increase. Probably better would be to keep existing engines and then add new optional items like turning thrusters which could add turning in addition to what engines have or thrust boosters that could add thrust. _________________ For support, please create a support ticket here and I will get back to you as soon as possible. About Star Sonata. |
Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:16 pm |
|
Team:
Rank: Officer Main: StarDrifter SunSoar Level: 3093 Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:23 pm Posts: 458 Location: Near your cookies |
Now that sounds like a plan Jeff.
Yea I would love steering engines. AND, would be cool to have a graphic/particle effect when you are turning. _________________ http://angelicneo.mybrute.com =Neo= |
Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:40 pm |
|
Site Admin / Dev Team
Team:
Rank: Director Main: Jeff_L Level: 1969 Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 2:21 am Posts: 3894 Location: Santa Clara, CA |
OK, I've redone the stats and updating test with it. Basically the two changes are that
1) I made engines by and large a lot heavier than before and then also given more bonus strength to engines which are heavy and 2) Made a look up table for stealthy engines so that they are classified as one of 4 stealthy types and each type except "not stealthy" has a constant visibility and a particular reduction in power. This has resulted in almost every stealth engine being way stronger than before with I think only one exception. Some new stats of note are name / weight / size / thrust / turn Rhino Charge / 4.3 m / 340 / 565 / 20022 (triple the weight, more than double the old stats) Gigantic Dime Motion / 912k / 206 / 171 / 16005 (jacked the turn/thrust ratio way up on the Dime Motions) Grape influence / 153k / 120 / 150 / 3666 OS Fission / 940k / 208 / 461 / 6303 _________________ For support, please create a support ticket here and I will get back to you as soon as possible. About Star Sonata. |
Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:12 pm |
|
Page 6 of 12 |
[ 180 posts ] | Go to page Previous 1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 12 Next |
All times are UTC - 5 hours |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum |