Board Index | Search | Profile |
Page 1 of 2 |
[ 20 posts ] | Go to page 1, 2 Next |
Print view | Previous topic | Next topic |
Author | Message |
---|---|
over 9000!
Team:
Rank: Councilor Main: Churchill Level: 5620 Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm Posts: 11706 |
Just some notes over the past day. Is still a suggestion, but it's also notes.
-If you do not want to read this, gtfo of my topic. Gunner: Ordinance Supremancy Gunner is a Capital Ship Class under Fleet Focus. It is an offensive class, designed to be on the front lines. It is characterized by hitting hard, having an element of speed, some range, and a sturdy tank. It lacks the aggro control and sustainability of Berserker, as well as the sheer DPS and range of Sniper. The damage of its main weapons lies just under Berserker, but missiles allow it to match the latter’s total damage. Part 1: Missiles All Missiles would use the Kinetic Missile Base. Essentially, the code the forms the Kinetic Missiles replaces any code for any other player accessible missile. The other missiles are renamed to what they are now and added to wherever they came from. A Kinetic Missile is fired from its launcher at a pretty high speed towards the intended target. It accelerates to its max speed(if it can before impact) and explodes onto the target with a small amount of splash damage should it miss ever so slightly. That is how all missiles should act. the difference is that Gunners would have more powerful missiles that goes much faster. They would also gain access to mobile factories that can produce missiles with debuffs. Each Missile Launcher would be assigned to an individual missile. When the missile dies or explodes, a new one pops up for the launcher. Different launchers would do different things. The best overall launchers are intended as Broadsword Launchers. Claymore and Skirmish Launchers would have different attributes suited for different play-styles and tasks. Freighters, Light Fighters, and Heavy Fighters have their own launchers, but they would be rather limited to what they could do. Missiles are not affected by Collision Code, but will explode on the first enemy they come across. Missiles have a set timer, usually 10 seconds. Specialized missiles and different launchers could increase/decrease the time limit. Missile Mastery provides a +1% Missile Operations Stat per level. Missile Operations is +2.5% Missile Damage, +5% Missile Speed, and +10% Missile Thrust. Part 2: Damage Gunners would do roughly the same damage as a zerk of the same level and setup, but without the nifty aggro control and sustainability. This means that in the Gunner class skills, an extra +100% Total Damage must be accounted for. Scrapping the Big Guns damage buffs, per level is suggested to be +3% damage for capital ships, and +1% damage for others. With Destruction, the damage should also be +2% damage for capital ships, in addition to the Destruction efect. Note that capital ships get a very crazy damage boost compared to the others. That is intended. Gunner is an offensive capital ship class. Missiles will make up the remaining damage to complete the Gunner being exactly the same damage as a zerk. Part 3: Gunships, a new kind of capital ship As the title says, there would be a new kind of capital ship called a Gunship. What makes it so special is the fact Gunships all have 3 augmenter slots, like a Heavy Fighter. They tend to have more hull than Heavy Fighters of the same Tier and Tech, and do not have any kind of hostility bonus. Sometimes they will have offensive bonuses. Gunships have a unified set of resists, like the Earthforce Capital Line. There is a weakness to mining damage, and a single damage type strength, but the rest of their resists is the same number. In the end, a Gunner’s ship has more range than a zerk, is faster than a zerk or sniper, has the same damage as the zerk, but less range and damage than the sniper, and loses the aggro control and sustainability of the zerk. Part 4: Debuffs Gunners would have access to Gunner-locked Aura Gens. These do not provide a field, merely take the slot. What they do is change the gunner's debuff from the default destruction to one of a various other kinds of debuffs. Unequipping any equipped gunner aura resets debuff back to default destruction. Hyperion Capital Ships The Kalthi in Hyperion would have a series of Gunner oriented capital ships to obtain. They’d be obtained via missions, rather than BP’s. However, the costs would be exactly the same if it was BP based. These ships are Gunships, so they have 3 augmenter slots and a higher amount of weapon slots. They are meant to be in the thick of fighting, so they have good resists, ample speed, and a special inbuilt launcher, each. The ships’ names would be, imo, Kalthi Retribution(T13), Kalthi Nemesis(T16), Kalthi Vengeance(T19), and Kalthi Vendetta(T20). All Kalthi Gunships use the Kalthi Avenger model and texture. Parenthesis denote changing stats from one ship to another with the one not encircled being a static amount not changing from any ship, or the T16's stat. Ex. Kalthi Nemesis Hull Class: Capital Ship Tech: 16 Speed: (80)90(100)(110) Hull: (500)600(750)(900) Augs: 3 Weapons: 6 Resists: 70H, (30)35(40)(45)E, 35L, 35P, 35R, 35S, (15)20(25)(30)M Vis: 50 Ref: 50% Elect: (25)25(30)(35) Inbuilts: +20% Damage, +20% Shield, +20% ROF Items: Kalthi Missile Launcher Kalthi Missile Launcher: 4 Missiles, launched at 1 second per. +25% Heat Missile Damage Gunships for Vicar(Bishop), Warden(Sky Marshal), Porpoise(Dolphin), Shrimp(Lobster), Rosy(Privateer), Reaver+(Reaver+), Narwhal(Narwhal), and Zebra(Jackal) would be added. (Names of the Gunships in parenthesis) A. Gunner Gear 1. Weaponry Their weapons should encourage fighting at medium range, with good DPH. These weapons should also look bigger than normal, as they are intended to be fired from a big capital ship, rather than a puny fighter. Weapons that look like Titan Torpedo, Mzungu Big Pulse, and ACAL are good examples of what new gunner weapons should look like. 2. Shields/Energy Bank based with Resist/Elect Temp bonuses to make up for less than stellar Regen/Elect stats. Similar design to current capship locked and oriented gear, like CCR and GGnT. 3. Radar/Engine/Misc Larger pieces of gear not unlike Lion gear is fine. No need for any real addition for them. 4. Missile Launchers While missiles are not the primary means of damage anymore, launchers should not be neglected. Ideally, missiles would fire away from the fight, then turn around and rocket towards the target slamming into them with force. 4A. Missile Types Missiles should be able to do damage, as well as debuff if the missile is supposed to do that. More immersion to specific types of AI’s. 4B. Since missiles all would use the Kinetic Missile Base, Missiles of all or most damage types could be add. I suggest using a basic group of Kinetic, AP, Plasma, and Explosive be used, with special types such as Cheetah and Radioactive being from specific places. 4C. Higher end versions of the basic missiles could be from unique places too. For example, Huge missiles would not exist from basic locations. To obtain Huge Plasma Missiles, you’d need to do Red Photon a few times for the factory bp. 4D. Factory bps would be changed, at least somewhat. The type of missile [crate] it produces determines the type of items you’d need to collect. For example, a Kinetic factory needs items that have to do with physical damage. A Large Kinetic Factory may need a Rock Launcher(because it’s a physical weapon). B. Gunner class skills Currently, the skills are(per level): Gunner Class: +5% Multi-fire, +5% Weapon Hold Big Guns: Capital Ships +3% Mining damage, Others + 1% mining damage Destruction: Target gets + 0.5% Vulnerability to damage type on impact, or 1% Vulnerability if Multi-firing Missile Mastery: +5% to all missile stats Suggested Change: Gunner Class: +5% Multi-fire; +5% Weapon Hold Big Guns: Capital Ships +3% Damage, Others +1% Damage Destruction: Target +0.5% Vulnerability on impact, or +1% if MFing; +2% Capital Ship Damage Missile Mastery: +1% Missile Operations Stat per level. Missile Operations is +2.5% Missile Damage, +5% Missile Speed, and +10% Missile Thrust Missiles are vastly weakened in favor of special effects. Instead of a Small AP doing 500 damage, it’d do 100 damage. Instead, AP missiles would have a chance of doing TRUE damage, or damage that ignores the target’s resists. To unify the missiles, small missiles should do 100 damage, medium at 200, large at 350, and huge at 500. Remember, damage is secondary to their effects. Specific debuff missile variants of the original batch would also be obtainable. (Debuff version does 50% of original’s damage and add a new effect to target) Ex. AP: 5% Chance of dealing True Damage (-25% Range for 2.5 seconds) Kinetic: 5% Chance of explosive impact (+50% Weight for 3 seconds) Plasma: 5% of Damage over time (Splash Fires at 50% missile’s damage in range) Explosive: 10% of damage done in Splash range (+50% Elect temp for 1.5 seconds) The debuffs last only for a short time, so the gunner must choose between damaging his target, and debuffing his target. The gunner cannot do both at the same time as the effect timer is way too short. _________________ Salt Assault drew this conclusion from the latest devblog. [img]http://oi62.tinypic.com/33208ex.jpg[/img] |
Thu Dec 15, 2011 12:34 am |
|
Team:
Rank: Officer Main: Assassin's Sniper Level: 4011 Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:04 am Posts: 709 |
The man of ideas is back
And he has returned to do what he does best, oping the heck out of gunner. Fortunately for me I have never been a gunner and wouldn't know. _________________ I feel that I must share the awesomeness of one of the best riffs in history. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7mfaztK ... re=related +1 Internets |
Thu Dec 15, 2011 12:42 am |
|
Main: Time Warp
Level: 3332 Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:59 am Posts: 3736 Location: Australia |
I read the first paragraph then stopped, because you're wrong.
Battlecruiser23 wrote: Gunner is a Capital Ship Class under Fleet Focus. It is an offensive class, designed to be on the front lines. It is characterized by hitting hard, having an element of speed, some range, and a sturdy tank. It's a fleet focus. It is meant to aid the fleet by making enemy ships, bases and drones weaker. The damage/missiles/offensive powers are designed to compliment the negative-effects given to enemies. If anything, they're a utility class, as far as customised missiles, debuffs and still waiting on Auras. Timmeh _________________ andezrhode2a wrote: Timmeh is the exception to every rule. Battlecruiser23 wrote: /Timmeh! I mean /signed! sabre198 wrote: 1. Create C2 2. Time Warp quits 3. New players join 4. ... Profit?!? |
Thu Dec 15, 2011 12:52 am |
|
over 9000!
Team:
Rank: Councilor Main: Churchill Level: 5620 Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm Posts: 11706 |
It's as OP as zerker, which compared to a sniper...isn't that OP at all.
Offensive class means it takes the fight to the enemy. It doesn't rely on ambush or pets to deal damage. And you can go on the offense spearheaded by a gunner. Who has ever heard of an engineer or seer spearheading a bunch of snipers and zerks? _________________ Salt Assault drew this conclusion from the latest devblog. [img]http://oi62.tinypic.com/33208ex.jpg[/img] |
Thu Dec 15, 2011 12:59 am |
|
Member
Team:
Rank: Main: Kyp Level: 3482 Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:49 pm Posts: 1172 Location: my desk |
lets be honest, i didn't read the whole post. but when you lead off with the idea that gunner should be a combat class, you're clearly going in the wrong direction. Gunner isn't under combat focus, its under fleet focus. Fleet -> increasing squad dps while contributing minimal dps directly.
That being said, it is a shame that the solo/duo potential for gunners is rather limited. The DPS really isn't there, and honestly I think an easy fix would be to improve the increase in DPS across the cap laser line (probably by increasing ROF) so they get decent burst dps but can't sustain for shit since they are elec whores. Missiles are one of the worst quality elements in the game, so suggestions on that realm are warranted. But atm devs simply dont seem interested, sadly... What most of SS continually fails to realize is the stacking buff potential from using an FC and gunner and engineer aura drones in the same squad already give gunner a potential role for runs, without any changes. Dunno for sure if you fall under that category of witless asshats, just saying... _________________ Pies are yummy. |
Thu Dec 15, 2011 1:44 am |
|
Team:
Rank: Director Main: Casillas Level: 6 Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 7:03 pm Posts: 706 |
Zekk wrote: Missiles are one of the worst quality elements in the game, so suggestions on that realm are warranted. But atm devs simply dont seem interested, sadly... I'm pretty sure Blue Dwarf has been ripping his face off waiting to get at Gunner changes, but there is other stuff that is priority? Patience, Traderscum _________________ Giovani dos Santos ... Olé! |
Thu Dec 15, 2011 2:20 am |
|
over 9000!
Team:
Rank: Councilor Main: Churchill Level: 5620 Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm Posts: 11706 |
Zekk wrote: lets be honest, i didn't read the whole post. but when you lead off with the idea that gunner should be a combat class, you're clearly going in the wrong direction. Gunner isn't under combat focus, its under fleet focus. Fleet -> increasing squad dps while contributing minimal dps directly. I fully understand that it is a FLEET class, but it is an aggressively played class, like SD, Zerk, and Sniper, which puts it under offensive groups. A Gunner would be used to attack an enemy force, rather than defend a base as a monk would do. But unlike a zerk or sniper(or SD), it's limited to capital ships and doesn't feature the tank or range and dps of either zerk or sniper, respectively. It also is no where near as fast as a SD, though considerably faster than zerk and sniper if augged(Hera+) for it. While it would last a quite a long time if you pack on resist bonus gear, it lacks Imp Armor/Damage Control, which puts it as a secondary tank, like a FC. It does have plenty of squad based effects, through missiles and debuff gens, but the damage output is there for it to be used solo. Because Gunner isn't a pet class like engi/FC/shm, it has to rely on its own dps to fight, which makes it a completely different thing from FC. Missile damage is much weaker, though, due to lower base damage, lower damage buff from MM, and the fact a missile must go its top speed to achieve its damage. The missiles would finish off the versatility of the gunner. Quote: That being said, it is a shame that the solo/duo potential for gunners is rather limited. The DPS really isn't there, and honestly I think an easy fix would be to improve the increase in DPS across the cap laser line (probably by increasing ROF) so they get decent burst dps but can't sustain for shit since they are elec whores. Suggested change to skill wrote: Big Guns: Capital Ships +3% Damage, Others +1% Damage Destruction: Target +0.5% Vulnerability on impact, or +1% if MFing; +2% Capital Ship Damage Thats the point of the massive damage boost from the skills to the gunner's actual...guns. And the reasoning why missiles are suggested to be much worse damage wise, giving rise to effects on the missiles. However, ROF is a bad idea. The whole point of a battleship(from any game or RL navy) is to hit hard, not hit fast. But this isn't JUST to caplasers. The gunner would have access to Capital..Torpedoes, Pulse Guns, and more than one damage type of caplasers. The best mining weapons would be added with the lock of "Gunner only", but the inability of doing damage outside mining meant it would have been left out, or had to be owned by a very powerful player with tons of gear and funds to back his alt. So now, the suggestion has a serious boost to damage, putting it squarely in the realm of doing the damage of a zerk. Just not with the tank, minus elect temp, or hostility. Quote: Missiles are one of the worst quality elements in the game, so suggestions on that realm are warranted. But atm devs simply dont seem interested, sadly... What most of SS continually fails to realize is the stacking buff potential from using an FC and gunner and engineer aura drones in the same squad already give gunner a potential role for runs, without any changes. Dunno for sure if you fall under that category of witless asshats, just saying... Gunner could stack with FC, yes, but the problem was that you'd never see a FC and a Gunner on the same run unless the team has an abundance of both. Gunner just didn't do enough damage to cover the hole missing from the 16% that FC got more. And Gunner had to be an active player; the FC could just sit afk. Also, when the missiles ran out, so did a hefty portion of the dps. By making damage more powerful and missiles weaker, if the gunner runs out of missiles, no biggee. The gunner is just fine to carry on as is. Then, there was the issue that putting a FC on a run completely nullifies the engineer's AC&C drone's damage part of the aura. And I checked it. Assuming the FC is just there for the aura(since slaves tend to get raped in Oly) Squad1'sDPS: Zerk, Sniper, Sniper, Sniper, Sniper, FC. Squad2'sDPS: Zerk, Sniper, Sniper, Sniper, Gunner, FC. The weapon each person uses does 100 damage. Snipers doing 5x the damage of the zerk's damage. This is after augs and everything. Squad 1 has a combined 14,280 damage. Squad 2 has a combined 13,284 damage. Zerk has five 100 damage weapons, each sniper does 2500 damage, and the gunner has two 100 damage weapons. -To be a worthwhile class to bring on a run, the Gunner needs to be on a run with 5 snipers, 1 zerk, himself, and a FC. That leaves 2 shm. -6 snipers, 1 zerk, 1 FC loses out by 200 damage using the same weapons. -The gunner's squad only made a 2% difference over the other when it could outdps them So, when the amount of other non gunner dps players exceeds 6 dps classes, it is good. But anytime you can't get that much together(99% of the time), the gunner is easily usurped by a zerk, sd, or sniper. All of them outdps the gunner. _________________ Salt Assault drew this conclusion from the latest devblog. [img]http://oi62.tinypic.com/33208ex.jpg[/img] |
Thu Dec 15, 2011 2:35 am |
|
Team:
Rank: Main: thebattler36 Level: 2015 Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 3:24 am Posts: 2211 Location: Glasgow, Scotland |
You try to change too much at once and I don't like your idea that more power = faster. + I liked my suggestion about missile types better
_________________ Octo wrote: QFT Octo either owned the fish initially, or scooped it when he podded any/all of the above. |
Thu Dec 15, 2011 7:39 am |
|
Team:
Rank: Main: Stabberz Level: 2414 Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:55 am Posts: 3696 |
I like this suggestion.
_________________ Blue Dwarf wrote: In space, no one can hear you cha cha cha. |
Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:10 am |
|
over 9000!
Team:
Rank: Councilor Main: Churchill Level: 5620 Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm Posts: 11706 |
thebattler35 wrote: You try to change too much at once and I don't like your idea that more power = faster. + I liked my suggestion about missile types better The idea is to limit spamming. We'd want new gunners to play an active role in killing something, rather than have his engineer buddy or himself pull it or himself to the target and spam it with missiles. Then it pretty much becomes a mining version of DemonBlood Lincin Zerk that can't do anything else but Lincin and therefore fails when anyone could could keep range pops up. On the other hand, missiles fire away from the fight and arc back to ram itself into the target. Missiles with debuffs, all missiles with a default(not a debuff specific effect) effect. Etc. But the main point is that missiles will take a more or less backseat to the gunner's own weapons. They'll still be used for dps, but they won't be THE dps. _________________ Salt Assault drew this conclusion from the latest devblog. [img]http://oi62.tinypic.com/33208ex.jpg[/img] |
Thu Dec 15, 2011 9:24 am |
|
Team:
Rank: Main: thebattler36 Level: 2015 Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 3:24 am Posts: 2211 Location: Glasgow, Scotland |
Battlecruiser23 wrote: thebattler35 wrote: You try to change too much at once and I don't like your idea that more power = faster. + I liked my suggestion about missile types better The idea is to limit spamming. We'd want new gunners to play an active role in killing something, rather than have his engineer buddy or himself pull it or himself to the target and spam it with missiles. Then it pretty much becomes a mining version of DemonBlood Lincin Zerk that can't do anything else but Lincin and therefore fails when anyone could could keep range pops up. On the other hand, missiles fire away from the fight and arc back to ram itself into the target. Missiles with debuffs, all missiles with a default(not a debuff specific effect) effect. Etc. But the main point is that missiles will take a more or less backseat to the gunner's own weapons. They'll still be used for dps, but they won't be THE dps. I'm of the opposite view, I think that missiles should be the main part of gunner damage. FC damage is limited mainly to slaves(their own special weapon), so why shouldn't gunner damage be limited similarly. _________________ Octo wrote: QFT Octo either owned the fish initially, or scooped it when he podded any/all of the above. |
Thu Dec 15, 2011 9:56 am |
|
over 9000!
Team:
Rank: Councilor Main: Churchill Level: 5620 Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm Posts: 11706 |
Gunner's version of slaves is his guns, called...Left and Right.
Missiles to Gunners as Fighters are to FC. Have you seen Jey? _________________ Salt Assault drew this conclusion from the latest devblog. [img]http://oi62.tinypic.com/33208ex.jpg[/img] |
Thu Dec 15, 2011 10:14 am |
|
Main: Sceadu
Level: 1913 Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 11:38 pm Posts: 1381 |
FC's SHOULD be using fighters. Most do. Only at the endgame, when you can tweak out your own ships to insane levels do fighters become superfluous.
Missiles should provide the majority of gunner DPS. I believe that the Debuff that gunners give should be based on their DPS. The more DPS(including missile DPS), the more debuff. This makes gunners on runs require actual use, strategy, and teamwork to maximize their impact. _________________ http://www.fanfiction.net/u/1408128/Demiser_of_D landswimmer wrote: ALL HAIL CYG THE MESSIAH! |
Thu Dec 15, 2011 5:08 pm |
|
Team:
Rank: Councilor Main: Gold Spacer Level: 3614 Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 7:14 pm Posts: 469 Location: Illinois, USA |
I like the Gunships part, and the changing mining damage to just damage in the Class Skills, would make Gunners a bit more versatile.
_________________ Goldylox |
Thu Dec 15, 2011 5:20 pm |
|
Main: Sceadu
Level: 1913 Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 11:38 pm Posts: 1381 |
I would prefer the majority of damage boost to be in mining, but a secondary boost to others. Maybe half.
_________________ http://www.fanfiction.net/u/1408128/Demiser_of_D landswimmer wrote: ALL HAIL CYG THE MESSIAH! |
Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:52 pm |
|
Page 1 of 2 |
[ 20 posts ] | Go to page 1, 2 Next |
All times are UTC - 5 hours |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum |