Talk:Example Ship Page - Revision history

Nuromishi at 17:08, 31 December 2010

2010-12-31T17:08:11Z

2009-03-11T15:53:16Z

‎This should be changed, and color.

2009-03-11T06:50:22Z

‎This should be changed, and color.: new section

2008-11-17T22:26:27Z

7 revisions

2008-02-10T21:31:50Z

‎Disorganized looking?

2008-02-10T04:28:53Z

Discussion?

2008-02-10T04:27:52Z

New section: -- ~~~~

2007-08-31T16:44:09Z

2007-08-24T02:40:16Z

2007-08-23T22:49:09Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Is it really necessary to include number of ship slots when it is simply ship Tech rounded up? --209.66.18.104 09:59, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
@@ Line 19: / Line 20: @@
 Additionally, what colors are available for the text? nothing would work for me for some reason, which makes some of the brighter background colors impractical.
 :[http://qed.princeton.edu/index.php/MediaWiki:Color_Names have a look at the colors] -[[Image:Simon Game.gif|20px]][[User:Simon|Simon]] <small>[[User talk:Simon|''talk'']]</small> 15:53, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:53, 11 March 2009
Line 18:		Line 18:

	Additionally, what colors are available for the text? nothing would work for me for some reason, which makes some of the brighter background colors impractical.		Additionally, what colors are available for the text? nothing would work for me for some reason, which makes some of the brighter background colors impractical.
		+	:[http://qed.princeton.edu/index.php/MediaWiki:Color_Names have a look at the colors] -[[Image:Simon Game.gif\|20px]][[User:Simon\|Simon]] <small>[[User talk:Simon\|''talk'']]</small> 15:53, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:50, 11 March 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:
	===Re: Disorganized looking? -- [[User:Simon\|Simon]] 13:31, 10 February 2008 (PST)===		===Re: Disorganized looking? -- [[User:Simon\|Simon]] 13:31, 10 February 2008 (PST)===
	This is the ordering of stats from the item form ship. I do like the bulletted form.		This is the ordering of stats from the item form ship. I do like the bulletted form.
		+
		+	== This should be changed, and color. ==
		+
		+	This page should be changed to the current one.
		+
		+	Additionally, what colors are available for the text? nothing would work for me for some reason, which makes some of the brighter background colors impractical.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:31, 10 February 2008
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Dont you think that the current looks somewhat disorganized? Despite being standardized, it isn't really intuitive at all. Therefore, i was thinking of something along the lines of a vertical box thing...cant remember name of formating type(see recent changes by me). What i'd like, is like that, but vertical, or maybe multiple horisontal bars. What do you think?		Dont you think that the current looks somewhat disorganized? Despite being standardized, it isn't really intuitive at all. Therefore, i was thinking of something along the lines of a vertical box thing...cant remember name of formating type(see recent changes by me). What i'd like, is like that, but vertical, or maybe multiple horisontal bars. What do you think?
		+
		+	===Re: Disorganized looking? -- [[User:Simon\|Simon]] 13:31, 10 February 2008 (PST)===
		+	This is the ordering of stats from the item form ship. I do like the bulletted form.

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 Meant to say "half of ship tech", but was at work and trying to type fast. --72.73.204.3 19:40, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
-==  -- [[User:71.36.6.121|71.36.6.121]] 20:27, 9 February 2008 (PST) ==
+==Disorganized looking?==
 Dont you think that the current looks somewhat disorganized? Despite being standardized, it isn't really intuitive at all. Therefore, i was thinking of something along the lines of a vertical box thing...cant remember name of formating type(see recent changes by me). What i'd like, is like that, but vertical, or maybe multiple horisontal bars. What do you think?

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:26, 17 November 2008
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:27, 10 February 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Meant to say "half of ship tech", but was at work and trying to type fast. --72.73.204.3 19:40, 23 August 2007 (PDT)		Meant to say "half of ship tech", but was at work and trying to type fast. --72.73.204.3 19:40, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
		+
		+	== -- [[User:71.36.6.121\|71.36.6.121]] 20:27, 9 February 2008 (PST) ==
		+
		+	Dont you think that the current looks somewhat disorganized? Despite being standardized, it isn't really intuitive at all. Therefore, i was thinking of something along the lines of a vertical box thing...cant remember name of formating type(see recent changes by me). What i'd like, is like that, but vertical, or maybe multiple horisontal bars. What do you think?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:40, 24 August 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	: Aparently... because its half the tech of the ship rounded up.... -[[User:Simon\|Simon]] 15:49, 23 August 2007 (PDT)		: Aparently... because its half the tech of the ship rounded up.... -[[User:Simon\|Simon]] 15:49, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
		+
		+
		+	Meant to say "half of ship tech", but was at work and trying to type fast. --[[User:72.73.204.3\|72.73.204.3]] 19:40, 23 August 2007 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:49, 23 August 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is it really necessary to include number of ship slots when it is simply ship Tech rounded up? --[[User:209.66.18.104\|209.66.18.104]] 09:59, 23 August 2007 (PDT)		Is it really necessary to include number of ship slots when it is simply ship Tech rounded up? --[[User:209.66.18.104\|209.66.18.104]] 09:59, 23 August 2007 (PDT)
		+
		+	: Aparently... because its half the tech of the ship rounded up.... -[[User:Simon\|Simon]] 15:49, 23 August 2007 (PDT)